Four years ago: How Trump changed America. About 73 million Americans decided they want more Trump. About 13 million Americans, which is the gap between the votes that Biden got (81 million) and Harris (approximately 68 million) got decided protesting is more important than the risk of a Trump presidency. Trump won about 74 million votes in 2020, so basically the same number of people voted for him this time, that doesn’t look to me like more undecided swung to Trump but rather people who voted for Biden in 2020 did not vote in 2024. Protesting feels good but in this way doesn’t produce whatever is the desired result, it will not result in a change in the number of parties and it certainly will not result in the stopping of what is happening in Gaza. Of course it’s your right to protest.
First thought was to why, there is a difference between expecting people to tolerate something and expecting them to comply. I think a lot of people feel that they are being told to comply on a lot of cultural issues they don’t agree to. Further, being told to comply is to them anti-democratic, so I suspect the majority of people who voted believe they voted for democracy.
Why is it that a Presidential election is such a big deal? The President is intended to be the administrator of a government, faithfully executing the laws enacted by Congress. By design, and literally by name, the House of Representatives is most representative of you as an individual, so how come the Congressional elections are not bigger? SCOTUS has literally told us, in its immunity decision, that Congress is the only branch of government that can hold Presidential power in check. Do you realize that had the Senate and House had a different mix of Democrats and Republicans that this whole Presidential election would be different? All of the things that either Presidential candidate claims to do cannot be done without a law or assistance of Congress.
Finally, Democracy is not defined by the existence of elections, nations not considered democratic hold elections. What defines democracy is how the results of the elections are treated. Democracy exists when it’s accepted that an election has a winner and a loser, before AND after the election takes place.
One of the reasons why extremism is so effective in American politics is that many people cast their votes based on feelings rather than history, such as what a person did when they were in office, or policy, or what the candidates say they will do. Consequently elections are popularity contests and not job interviews. The whole point of campaign rallies is to stir emotions, to “fire up” the base. What exactly is the base? History has shown the consequence of elections based emotions rather than actions.
The problem with extremism is not only that for some it creates enemies but also that for a large group of people it creates knee jerk reactions against. For these people, anything that sounds extreme to them is to not be believed or at least not react to. In my view, these are people like the frog in the warm water that doesn’t jump out as the temperature increases to boiling. All of this is by design to get us either fighting against each other or to take no action.
I think the following quote sums up my position on Harris v. Trump, and I like the entire Atlantic article in which it was written:
If the country is inching toward a more pro-Palestinian stance, the struggle will take place within the Democratic Party. Harris is movable. Who among the Republicans will put pressure on Trump to care about Palestinians? Tom Cotton? Marco Rubio? Stephen Miller?
I understand why people who have a strong dislike for the U.S. Federal government, and want to see it blown up, vote for Trump because there is high probability he will provide the result they desire. However, for every other desired outcome, I think the probability is higher with Democrats in office than Republicans.
Even the most democratic of rights, the right to protest, is most probable of being defended by Democrats than Republicans.
Looking at the Cubs end of season summary by BleedCubbieBlue.com, I think the last list that compares the top ten players from the 2023 season to the 2024 season shows the best explanation for why the Cubs did not the playoffs. All of the Cubs best 2023 players regressed in 2024, and in the case of Cody Bellinger, the regression was dramatic. Last off season we did want Bellinger to leave, but I think this off season if Bellinger does leave the impact will not be as big.
I’ve made an effort this year to post more pictures here. A consequence of traveling for a week is the appearance of several pictures on this page.
Most of the leaves of trees near me have dropped except for this one tree that has been slower.
I am pretty sure the temperature hit a record high here in southeast Michigan. Here I am walking outside in a T-shirt and shorts on the last week of October.
Yesterday we went off the beaten path and saw parts of northern Wisconsin for the first time.
Today we crossed the mighty Mac
The first day of our fall 🍁 road trip was fantastic.
I wonder whether religion’s emphasis on belief rather than faith is contributing to the current state of the United States in which believing an outlandish statement, or at least tolerating it, is about showing loyalty. Immigrants eating dogs and cats? I’ll nod my head politely (just like in church when something I am supposed believe but don’t is said), maybe even say, “it’s possible, what do I know?” because it is how I show I am loyal. Stating one’s beliefs or agreeing to a statement of beliefs in the context of religion is a statement of one’s loyalty to that religion.
More fall color is appearing on this tree from when I took this picture of it a week ago.
Finished reading: Falling Upward, Revised and Updated by Richard Rohr 📚 This is third time I’ve read this book, albeit the first time of this edition. It might be the most important book I’ve ever read in how it opens my eyes.
Long time fellow blogger Dave Farquhar frequently writes interesting articles about computing history. I recommend his site, The Silicon Underground.
Android 15 Private Space
I really like this post by John Philipin, and this quote about education and colleges that I wish was my own:
A university is to educate .. not train. If you are wondering about the difference, ask yourself if you prefer your children to attend sex education classes or sex training classes.
My additional two cents is that this is the consequence of a society that defines success as wealth, and wealth as a dollar value. Already back when I was in college in the mid 80s, the majority of my colleagues were there to get the degree to get the “good paying” job. Honestly, that is why I went to college, because the society I lived in, which included my family and peers and nearly all adults defined success as wealth and wealth dependent on a college degree. The point of view may have been framed as enabling the middle class to move up, but in reality it was the destruction of the middle class.